Art Squad

I have been having further thoughts about the Art Squad of the Pyongyang Poultry Guidance Bureau and, what with one thing and another, I have decided I really don’t want to go and live in North Korea. Instead, I am going to set up my own Art Squad and offer its services to my local Poultry Guidance Bureau.

The first problem is that I am not sure there actually is a Poultry Guidance Bureau in my bailiwick. Certainly I have been unable to find any evidence of one. The second problem, related to the first, is that I do not quite know what a Poultry Guidance Bureau is or does. “Poultry” and “Bureau” are clear enough, but the “Guidance” bit has me baffled. Are we talking about some sort of counselling service for distraught chickens? Or is the guidance more literal, involving directional pointing devices showing hens the way from their coop to… I don’t know, to wherever else in the farmyard they have urgent hen-business to attend to. Can hens read simple directional pointing devices?

It might be that the Bureau, despite its name, isn’t for the guidance of poultry at all, but for the guidance of humans in their interactions with poultry. I can understand that that might be a useful service. After all, if you presented me with several chickens, squawking and pecking, I doubt very much if I’d have the faintest idea what to do with them, at least on an immediate basis. I suspect I might panic if I found a peep of chickens or a bevy of quail abandoned on my doorstep by a feckless farmer. I can well imagine how reassuring it would be, in such a circumstance, to have a hotline to the Poultry Guidance Bureau. Even if my initial surmise was correct, and the Bureau was a counselling service for poultry, I presume they would send an outreach worker to placate the poor abandoned chickens and quail, which would be rampaging around my living room making an unholy mess. Well, I could hardly just leave them on the doorstep, could I?

Obviously I am going to have to ascertain the precise nature of the Poultry Guidance Bureau’s business before I can make a proper fist of the Art Squad. It might be, for example, that our art will consist simply of beautifully-painted directional pointing devices, designed to appeal to the optic nerves of poultry, in which case I will just need to gather about me a bunch of sign-painters. On the other hand, we may need a team of actors to facilitate role-playing exercises for traumatised hens as part of the counselling service. Or, if the Bureau is indeed mainly for human benefit, then an oompah band playing stirring anthems might be more appropriate, although having just written that I can’t think why.

All things considered, my best bet is to assemble a crack squad of sign-painters, actors, and oompah band musicians, together with a few practitioners of other arts, just to be on the safe side. We can then devise and rehearse an arts squad praxis to present as a fait accompli to the nearest Poultry Guidance Bureau, when, that is, we manage to track it down in its lair.

There is at least one thing we can be clear of, and that is what top class poultry art looks like. Some years ago we were pleased to feature this splendid painting by Emma Watts, originally published in Mustard Plaster.

tinyenid

Two Dinners

Compare and contrast:

a list of the grub rustled up by the Merchant Taylors’ Company to welcome Prince Henry into their ranks in the summer of 1607:

Swans, godwit, shovellers, partridges, owls, cuckoos, ringdoves, pullets, ducklings, teal, peacocks, rabbits, leverets and a great turkey… along with 1,300 eggs, three great lobsters and 200 prawns, salmon, salt fish, plaice, sole, dory, carp and tenches, sirloins and ribs of beef, mutton and lambs’ dowsets, neats’ tongues and sweet breads, and to conclude the evening, figs, dates, prunes, currants, almonds, strawberries, gooseberries, cherries, pears, apples, damsons, oranges and quinces. Twenty-eight barrels of beer were provided to slake the diners’ thirst, together with more than 440 gallons of wine.

from Ben Jonson by Ian Donaldson (2011), reviewed here (thanks to Elberry for the link)

The dinner began with a soup of asps in simmering oil. On each side was a dish of vegetables, one containing thistles and burdocks, and the other fuming acid. Other side dishes, of turtles, rats, bats and moles, were garnished with live coals. For the fish course he ate a dish of snakes in boiling tar and pitch. His roast was a screech owl in a sauce of glowing brimstone. The salad proved to be spider webs full of small explosive squibs, a plate of butterfly wings and manna worms, a dish of toads surrounded with flies, crickets, grasshoppers, church beetles, spiders, and caterpillars. He washed all this down with flaming brandy, and for dessert ate the four large candles standing on the table, both of the hanging side lamps with their contents, and finally the large center lamp, oil, wick and all. This leaving the room in darkness, Dufour’s face shone out in a mask of living flames.

from Miracle Mongers And Their Methods: A Complete Exposé Of The Modus Operandi Of Fire Eaters, Heat Resisters, Poison Eaters, Venomous Reptile Defiers, Sword Swallowers, Human Ostriches, Strong Men, Etc by Harry Houdini (1921)

The Walking Dead

ZZ328DF20Ctop1

Now that the second series of apocalyptic zombie drama The Walking Dead hits the TV screens, I consider it my duty to inform Hooting Yard readers of an important fact. Lead actor Andrew Lincoln, pictured above in the guise of his character, sheriff’s deputy Rick Grimes, is the son-in-law of Jethro Tull luminary Ian Anderson.

I hope the scriptwriters have taken inspiration from the family connection. In a future episode I shall expect to see a flute-playing zombie standing on one leg.

Advice Regarding Eggs

Here at Hooting Yard we are regularly inundated with queries relating to eggs. Here, for example, is a plaintive plea from reader Tim Thurn:

Q – When you are dining with an intimate friend, and an omelette au rhum is served, what do you do?

My spies tell me that Tim has copied out this question from Rambles In Womanland by Max O’Rell (1903), wherein the answer is given thus:

A – Without any ceremony, you take a spoon, and, taking the burning liquid, you pour it over the dish gently and unceasingly. If you are careless, and fail to keep the pink and blue flame alive, it goes out at once, and you have to eat, instead of a delicacy, a dish fit only for people who like, or are used to have, their palates scraped by rough food. If you would be sure to be successful, you will ask your friend to help you watch the flame, and you will even ask him to lift the omelette gently so that the rhum may be poured all over it until the whole of the alcohol contained in the liquor is burned out.

I might add that taking a spoon without any ceremony is easier said than done, but my remarks on that will have to wait for our series on spoons and ceremonies, which is forthcoming.

Guns Before Butter

I had some guns and I had some butter. Early in life, one learns to put guns before butter, even though if one were to follow the alphabet strictly, one would put butter before guns. But I learned my lessons well, so whenever I buy a new dictionary, and I often do, I turn immediately to the section of words beginning with G, find the entry for “guns”, snip it out with a sharp pair of scissors, then leaf back through the dictionary to the section of words beginning with B, locate the entry for “butter”, then paste in the snipped-out section just above it, with mucilage. Of course, what this all means is that I have a hole in my dictionary and a gap on the reverse of the page where “guns” appeared, and also I have obscured the text just above the entry for “butter” by pasting my snippage over it. But this is a small price to pay for following the edict drummed into me by my parents and my schoolteachers and my military chaplains, one which I have never called into question, though at times I have been tempted to do so.

Yes, sad to say there was a time when I was beset by anxiety dreams, in which I was poised, with a sharp pair of scissors, to cut out “guns” and its definition from a brand new dictionary, the pot of mucilage and a spatula beside the dictionary on the desk, and my hand trembled and I could not make the snip. I had this dream, or nightmare, over and over again for a number of years. In a more alarming variant, I dreamed that I managed to cut out the “guns” entry, but then mislaid it, or dropped it into a wastepaper bin, or it was consumed by flames and I had but a pile of ash, which I then painstakingly tried to paste, atom by atom, into the dictionary, with mucilage, and I would wake up shrieking.

Oddly, it never occurred to me to snip out the definition for “butter” and paste it, with mucilage, immediately after “guns” in the dictionary. Had I ever done so, the net result would have been the same. I would still have had a hole and a gap and an obscured definition, one for a word beginning with G rather than with B.

I have always made it a habit to be in possession of both guns and butter, but to be very clear about which takes priority. When laying my breakfast table of a morning, for example, now I can no longer afford a valet and have to fend for myself, I always place a pair of pistols on the tablecloth first, and the butter dish second. All other necessaries – toast-rack, plate, bowl, nutcracker, and so on – can be laid out in any old order I choose, as haphazard as you like. But I have learned through experience that if I put the butter dish on the breakfast table before the guns, I suffer from terrible indigestion thereafter. Such is the power of the mind. Clearly there is no physiological reason why I will be stricken with gastric horrors in such circumstances, for breakfast is the same every morning, with minor variants. Special K, buttered toast, a handful of filberts and a pot of tea are the four essential items, to which I might add some eggs or porridge, or eggy porridge, but rarely, rarely.

I will usually handle the firearms while chewing my toast, checking they are well oiled and primed, the chambers fully loaded with bullets, and the safety catches on. When I had a valet, I liked to amuse myself by taking pot shots at him, first with one pistol and then with the other, while chewing my toast. He was a lithe valet, as valets go, and he always managed to leap and vault and jump and shimmy out of the paths of the bullets, until that Thursday morning when he did not.

Another instance of my putting guns before butter is when packing my things for a camping and hiking trip. First I pack my guns, then, following Gould’s system, in order, my axe (in cover), axle-grease, bacon, barometer (pocket), bean-pot, beans (in bag), beef (dried), beeswax, Bible, blacking and brush, blankets, boxes, bread for lunch, brogans (oiled), broom, canned goods, chalk, cheese, clothes-brush, cod-line, coffee and pot, comb, compass, condensed milk, cups, currycomb, dates, dippers, dishes, dish-towels, drawers, dried fruits, Dutch oven, envelopes, figs, firkin, fishing-tackle, flour (prepared), frying-pan, guide-book, half-barrel, halter, hammer, hard-bread, harness (examine!), hatchet, haversack, ink (portable bottle), knives (sheath, table, pocket and butcher), lemons, liniment, lunch for day or two, maps, matches and safe, marline, meal (in bag), meal-bag, medicines, milk-can, molasses, money (“change”), monkey-wrench, mosquito-bar, mustard and pot, nails, neat’s-foot oil, night-shirt, oatmeal, oil-can, opera-glass, overcoat, padlock and key, pails, paper, paper collars, pens, pepper, pickles, pins, portfolio, postage stamps, postal cards, rope, rubber blanket, rubber coat, rubber boots, sail-needle, salt, salt fish, salt pork, salve, saw, shingles (for plates), shirts, shoes and strings, slippers, soap, song-book, spade, spoons, stove (utensils in bags), sugar, tea, tents, tent poles, tent pins, tooth-brush, towels, twine, vinegar, watch and key, and then at the very last the butter-dish and cover, with the butter in it. An unfortunate consequence of this system, and one which still occasionally has me tempted to wonder if my parents and my schoolteachers and my military chaplains were indeed correct in their insistence on guns before butter, is that if one needs one’s guns as a matter of urgency, there is a great deal of unpacking and rummaging and faffing in order to get at them.

I remember that once, for example, I set out on a hike, and had got no further than a few yards beyond my garden gate when I was saw, looming ahead of me, a sleuth of ferocious bears. Frantically, I unpacked and rummaged and faffed, but by the time I lay hold of my guns I had had one of my arms torn off and a bloodied lip. Luckily, one shot of my pistol into the air and the ferocious bears became cowardly, and scattered. When I told this tale to a military chaplain in the clinic where they fitted my prosthetic arm, he explained to me that I ought to have used the easily-accessible, because last packed, butter to smear a greasy patch between myself and the bears, upon which they would have slipped and toppled over, giving me plenty of time to unpack and rummage and faff for the guns.

“But then,” I protested, “I would have no butter for my toast during the hike, Padre.”

“You are clearly unfamiliar, my child,” he said, “With that piece of countryside wisdom which goes: ‘In river, stream and rill catch thee perch and pike, But never butter your toast when you’re going on a hike’.”

I had not heard that, but it made a lot of sense. I did wonder where a military chaplain had picked up rustic lore, but he further explained to me that before taking religious orders he had, for many years, been a peasant, and still from time to time had bits of straw stuck in his hair. I felt very fortunate indeed to have him as my spiritual adviser. My late valet, bless his cotton socks, had also tried to dispense pearls of wisdom, and he too had been a peasant before going to valet school, but one thing that always struck me was that he had no view at all on the primacy of guns over butter. I would, for example, summon him to fetch my snippy scissors and pot of mucilage and spatula whenever I bought a new dictionary. Rather than simply doing as he was bidden, like an ideal valet, he would sigh and shuffle from foot to foot, even going so far as to suggest that I might for once leave my dictionary unmodified, with “butter” before “guns”, and employ my time instead with a less exacting activity, such as playing the harmonica or doing conjuring tricks. I had but to lay hold of one of my pistols, in easy reach on the table just in front of the butter, and point it at his head, and he scarpered in search of the scissors and mucilage and spatula. I suspect he would not have been so attentive had I picked up and pointed at him a knob of butter, which just goes to show how right my parents and my schoolteachers and my military chaplains were all along.

Camp Dabbler

Dabbler-3logo (1)

If, like me, you intend to spend the autumn in the great outdoors, entented at Camp Dabbler, be sure to read the by no means exhaustive list of Victorian camping gear stowed in my cupboard this week.

Useful as the list is, it raises a number of questions. The following puzzlers spring to mind, though I have not yet been able to come up with answers.

Which version of the Bible is best suited for a camping trip?

How many boxes should one pack, and of what kind?

Which is the most effective oil to apply to one’s Brogans?

Why is the harness the sole item on the list which one should examine, presumably before the start of the camping trip? Are we to assume that all the other things can be shoved willy nilly into one’s camping pantechnicon without them being given the once over with a gimlet eye?

“Meal (in bag). Meal-bag.” Does this mean the properly prepared camper should take two meal-bags, one containing meal and one empty? Or is the repetition designed to hammer the point home for the camping dunderpate, much as one hammers home the pegs of the dunderpate’s tent?

Regarding pens, should one take ballpoints (with tips about the size of a lobster’s brain) or thick black magic markers, or fountain pens, or indeed swans?

No particular song-book is recommended, and it would be helpful to have some idea of the kind of songs one might be expected to sing while hunched around the fire at Camp Dabbler.

If any readers can help out with these, or other camping-related questions thrown up by the list, please use the Comments facility.

Fifties Finnish Fairground Fun

Luna Park, the Linnanmäki [in Helsinki] … is high above the city on a granite outcrop with a water-tower that looks like a stone gasometer with trees growing on top, and which is circled with lights… One side-show, to judge by the pictures outside, was a house in which people are attacked by bees.
Oswell Blakeston, Sun At Midnight (1958)

Luna Park, the Linnanmäki [in Helsinki] … is high above the city on a granite outcrop with a water-tower that looks like a stone gasometer with trees growing on top, and which is circled with lights… One side-show, to judge by the pictures outside, was a house in which people are attacked by bees.

Oswell Blakeston, Sun At Midnight (1958)

Jeanette Winterson Please Note

If you wish to become weak-headed, nervous, and good for nothing, read novels. I have seen an account of a young lady, who had become so nervous and excitable, in consequence of reading novels, that her head would be turned by the least appearance of danger, real or imaginary. As she was riding in a carriage over a bridge, in company with her mother and sister, she became frightened at some fancied danger, caught hold of the reins, and backed the carriage off the bridge, down a precipice, dashing them to pieces.
An American Woman, The Ladies’ Vase or, Polite Manual For Young Ladies (1849)

If you wish to become weak-headed, nervous, and good for nothing, read novels. I have seen an account of a young lady, who had become so nervous and excitable, in consequence of reading novels, that her head would be turned by the least appearance of danger, real or imaginary. As she was riding in a carriage over a bridge, in company with her mother and sister, she became frightened at some fancied danger, caught hold of the reins, and backed the carriage off the bridge, down a precipice, dashing them to pieces.

An American Woman, The Ladies’ Vase or, Polite Manual For Young Ladies (1849)

Weep, Pontius, For Thou Art Become Noddy

Today marks the sixtieth anniversary of the publication of Weep, Pontius, For Thou Art Become Noddy, a dirge of excruciating length by Mavis Goosebeak. It is a curious work, based on the conceit that Pontius Pilate was reincarnated as Enid Blyton’s little wooden boy. For the poetess, however, this appears to have been more than a mere conceit. She apparently believed it to be true, having been vouchsafed a vision during a session of faffing about with Tarot cards, magic crystals, sparrow oracles, runes, spells, dippy sticks and similar mumbo jumbo. “Vouchsafed”, by the way, is the sort of word that crops up with distressing frequency in the dirge.

Miss Goosebeak seems not to have considered what became of Pontius Pilate’s “ectoplasmic spirit essence” between the governor of Judaea’s death circa 37 AD and Noddy’s first appearance almost two thousand years later in 1949 AD. Nor did she ever address the inconvenient fact that the wooden boy is a fictional character. Challenged on such matters in radio interviews, her usual tactic was to flail her arms in a melodramatic gesture, thus deliberately knocking over her complimentary cup of tea, spilling the boiling hot beverage into the tweedy lap of her interviewer. After the subsequent kerfuffle she would babble about the tea leaves now visible at the bottom of the cup, explaining how their disposition revealed other mystic insights which might become the subject of another dirge of excruciating length, although so far as is known she never published anything else.

Interpretations of the dirge have varied. That trendy with-it churchman of the nineteen-fifties, Canon Nobby Fabgear, described it as a work of “deep Christian morality”, arguing that to be reborn as a fictional wooden being was a just fate for an imperfect, ethically compromised, all-too-human Judaean governor of the first century. He expounded this view in a series of articles in the colour supplements, at a time when such articles used to appear in the colour supplements.

Several more conservative clergy took a different view, excoriating Mavis Goosebeak for cheapening the Gospels and indulging in pagan practices with Tarot cards, magic crystals, sparrow oracles, runes, spells, dippy sticks and similar mumbo jumbo. She was accused of the ritual slaughter of goats and hens and of being in league with the Great God Pan, who – in some contemporary colour supplement cartoons – bore a distinct resemblance to Canon Fabgear.

In the teeth of all the controversy, the dirge itself was little-read, not least because it is virtually unreadable. Yet it gained a new lease of life late in the decade, when it was taken up with great enthusiasm by the beatniks. Goateed hepcats in black polo neck jumpers took to reciting the dirge at “happenings”, and there is an amusing account of Mavis Goosebeak’s attendance at one such event.

“It really fried my wig, daddy-o,” wrote the beatnik entrepreneur Herman Hornrims in his memoir, “When that crazy old biddy turned up at the espresso bar for a reading of Weep, Pontius, For Thou Art Become Noddy. She kept demanding to be given a pot of tea and a cup and saucer and, hey, we had to explain it was like an espresso bar, you dig? There was this cool cat with her dressed up like a priest, except he looked like the Great God Pan. Mavis got so mad she flailed her arms in a melodramatic gesture and spilled a cup of espresso in my lap.”

Some reports have Bernard Levin also present that night, incognito, though he always denied it.

The dirge has long been out of print, but Mavis Goosebeak, remarkably, is still with us, sharp as a button, living in a nursing home at a dilapidated seaside resort. Every afternoon she takes out the Tarot cards, magic crystals, sparrow oracles, runes, spells, dippy sticks and similar mumbo jumbo, and summons ethereal insights. It is thought she is trying to work out what became of the ectoplasmic spirit essence of Pontius Pilate after Noddy’s final appearance in 1963 AD and Enid Blyton’s death in 1968 AD. Her latest theory, intriguingly, again has a connection to Bernard Levin, for she is groping through the mystical mists towards the conviction that Pilate / Noddy is now inhabiting the body of Levin’s one-time inamorata, Arianna Huffington.