Fashion Sequence

Here is another magnificent extract from Further Science : Book 20 by Norman Davies. (See here.)

FASHION SEQUENCE

1. That from 1272/1327, there was a simple monk style.

2. 1327/99 – pointed shoes and sleeves.

3. 1399/1461 – bull horn hats – hence narrow central next/theatrical.

4. 1461/85 – Welsh witchy narrow central hats.

5. 1485/1509 – square curtained bed fashion peak/tall thin people.

6. 1509/47 – square wooden Henry 8th puff sleeves.

7. 1547/58 – dark fan skirt – Spanish.

8. 1558/1603 – Elizabethan/Drake bearded pirate/big tent waists and shoulders.

9. 1603/25 – Odd – big waists and metal narrow thorax.

10. 1625/49 – Van Dyke Cavalier/untrustworthy/lax floppy.

11. 1649/60 – dark Welsh witchy.

12. 1660/89 – dark brigand/Quaker hats.

13. 1689/1714 – tall narrow heads reaction.

14. 1714/27 – black Red Riding Hood.

15. 1727/60 – big waists.

16. 1760/90 – big heads.

17. 1790/1837 – long and thick/squashed.

18. 1837/60 – wooden thick.

19. 1860/80 – overdone.

20. 1880/1900 – odd.

21. 1901/18 – contrived.

22. 1918/30s – flighty freaks.

23. 1940/5 – War/frenzied mean to lower Middle class on.

24. 1946/8 – peak fine simple bold quality Middle class fashion.

25. Peak fine fashions occurred in the 14th Century/semi late 15th century /late 15th century / 1515 / 1695 / 1896 / 1946/8.

Scenes Of Domestic Bliss, No. 1

It was an overcast morning in July. Pansy Cradledew was up and about at an ungodly hour. Some time later, her inamorato woke up, and, glugging his morning coffee, asked:

“So what have you been up to so early in the day, my sweet, my darling dear?”

“Oh, I pulled the head off a bat,” replied Pansy.

Her inamorato spluttered a mouthful of coffee and almost choked, until it became clear that the bat in question was not some flesh and blood and sinew pipistrelle, but a model bat made from terracotta-coloured modelling clay. Pansy, it transpired, had fashioned a figurine of the hideous bat god Fatso, his “look” based on the equally hideous bat god Camazotz, and the removal of the head was a temporary measure to expedite the drying and setting process. Nonetheless, her crack o’ dawn activity led to the conversational exchange reported, causing much merriment and the splitting of sides.

Depressed Horse Never Knew Saucepans

Last week I spent some time as usual updating my log of Outa_Spaceman’s cardboard reality interventions. Commonly, my practice is to log the details of each intervention on a piece of cardboard and then to stow the piece of cardboard away in a cardboard box and forget about it. Intervention number 187, however, haunted my thoughts, night and day, until I felt impelled to take the lid off the cardboard box and remove the piece of cardboard on which I had logged the details. I propped it up against a similar, but empty, cardboard box in my fustiparlour, to keep it within my purview at all times, or at least at those times when I was indoors.

“Depressed horse never knew saucepans” reads the legend on intervention number 187. Where had I heard those words, in that order, before? Was it the title piece in a slim volume of twee verse by Dennis Beerpint? Was it a chapter heading from a bestselling paperback potboiler by Pebblehead? Or could it be the code phrase uttered by international woman of mystery Primrose Dent to gain access to her secret subterranean headquarters?

Luckily, there are reference books where one can look up this sort of thing, so I looked them up. That is, I looked up Beerpint and Pebblehead and Primrose Dent, in a biographical reference book, but grew none the wiser. I then consulted reference works on depression, horses, and saucepans, still to no avail. Yet the words continued to swirl around in my brain, their origin tantalisingly out of reach.

Previously on Hooting Yard, as they say in the American television series, when faced with such quandaries I have stalked off into the deep dense dark woods of Woohoohoodiwoo and sought the counsel of the Woohoohoodiwoo Woman. That freakish crone is a dab hand in the arts of recovered memory syndrome, and more than once she has brought bubbling to the surface of my cranium material which might otherwise have remained forever obscure and buried. On this occasion, however, my people learned from her people that the Woohoohoodiwoo Woman had gone on her holidays, to some benighted and dilapidated seaside resort, to suck sticks of rock and commune with seagulls in bird-language from the balcony of her seashore chalet. It came as something of a surprise to me to learn that the eldritch hag took holidays, like normal people do, and as I am ill-equipped to deal with surprises of any nature, I took to my bed for forty-eight hours, tossing and turning and whimpering weakly, as illusory phantasms gambolled and frolicked across the ceiling of my boudoir. The boudoir adjoins the fustiparlour, and by keeping the door open I was able to peer at the piece of cardboard propped against the empty cardboard box upon which I had logged the details of intervention number 187, including, of course, those haunting words.

By the time I was ready to face the world again, I had resolved to try to forget all about the depressed horse that never knew saucepans. The first step in my forgetting was to put the piece of cardboard back in the cardboard box where all my cardboard signage loggings were stored, but I made the mistake of preparing a snack before so doing. It was not the cream crackers which unhinged me, as they have done before. No, it was the processed cheese triangle I took from the refrigerator, intending it as an accompaniment, to be spread upon the cream crackers with a spatula. I did not even get as far as unwrapping the processed cheese triangle, transfixed as I was by the illustration, on its wrapper, of a laughing cow. Perversely, perhaps, the sight of a happy cow made me think immediately of a depressed horse. I replaced the processed cheese triangle, unopened and uneaten, in the refrigerator, and shovelled the cream crackers into my mouth one by one, chewing them to a pulp, and reflected sadly that until I could discover where in the name of all that is holy I had first encountered the words “Depressed horse never knew saucepans”, tormented me would never know rest.

You will be familiar with the phrases “barrack-room lawyer” and “pub philosopher”. Well, later that day I fell into conversation with a milk bar Jesuit. He had the appearance, character, mental agility, wiliness, black soutane, and fanatical religious commitment of a Jesuit, yet he was a mere habitué of the milk bar into which I popped to get a glass of milk with which to wash down my dry cream cracker snack. He was sitting at a table, drawing on it a line with a piece of chalk, as if he were about to mesmerise a duck, a Jesuitical trick once practised, on the twenty-seventh of April 1871 by Gerard Manley Hopkins, an actual Jesuit. There were no ducks to be seen in the milk bar, however, and when he invited me to sit at the empty place opposite his, I accepted. With his pincer-like brain he rapidly grasped that I was a troubled soul, and before the milk bar skivvy had brought me my glass of milk, I found I was pouring out those troubles.

“It is good that you did not stray down a pagan path by unburdening your soul to the Woohoohoodiwoo Woman in the deep dense dark woods of Woohoohoodiwoo,” he said, when I had finished telling the tally of my woes, by which time my milk had arrived, in a smudged and greasy glass.

“It seems to me,” he continued, “There are two ways to approach the problem, if problem it is.”

“Oh?” I asked, between slurps of milk.

“First, it could be that the laughing cow on the wrapping of your processed cheese triangle holds the key to the conundrum. It is certainly worth investigating the possibility that there exists, somewhere, on this continent or one of the others, a manufacturer of saucepans whose emblem is a depressed cow. Find that manufacturer, and you find the source of the phrase that haunts you!”

I nodded my agreement, but protested that I had already consulted a huge number of reference books without coming upon a mention of any such saucepan manufacturer. He chuckled Jesuitically.

“Well, no work of reference is truly exhaustive, not even the Bible,” he said, “Though that would be a good place to start. In the King James Version, for example, there are forty-three mentions of ‘horse’ and one hundred and nine of ‘horses’. And while it is true that one will search in vain for the words ‘depressed’ and ’saucepan’, it would be well to follow up the one hundred and six instances of ‘woe’, the twenty-two of ‘pot’ and the fifteen of ‘pots’. I would aver that the difference between a depressed horse that never knew saucepans and a woebegone horse that never knew pots is purely academic.”

I was about to express my surprise that a Jesuit would call on the authority of the King James Version rather than, say, the Douai Bible favoured by Catholics, but then I recalled that he was only a milk bar Jesuit, not a real one. It also occurred to me that, surprised as I was, if only momentarily, I remained eerily calm, and in no danger whatsoever of having to collapse back into my bed for a further forty-eight hours.

“You said there were two ways to approach the problem,” I said, “What is the second?”

“I hope your question does not indicate that you have dismissed out of hand my recommendation that you seek the answer in the Holy Book?” he rapped back.

“No,” I said, “I shall track down all the woe and horse and pot references as you suggest. But it’s fair to say I don’t hold out much hope.”

“Very well,” he said, steepling his fingers together, as if in prayer, and resting his chin upon them, “The second approach is as follows. Look carefully at these lines in chalk I have drawn upon the milk bar table.”

I did so – and was mesmerised, just like Hopkins’s duck. And it was while I was thus entranced that the milk bar Jesuit vouchsafed to me the reason for my nagging sense that somewhere before I had heard, or read, the words “Depressed horse never knew saucepans”.

Laughably, my first surmise had been almost correct. It was the title of a Dennis Beerpint poem! But the title of a poem the weedy poetaster had not yet written, nor even conceived within that frothing poetic brain inside his head! How then could I already know it? Well, when he snapped me out of the trance, the milk bar Jesuit revealed himself as an aficionado of Beerpint, my compadre in that little fellowship of admirers whose buzzings and twangings on the so-called Beerpintosphere keep track of everything, yes, everything even tangentially relevant to the poet and his doings, even his dreams. Dennis Beerpint had dreamed of writing a poem entitled “Depressed horse never knew saucepans”, and I had dreamed of his dream, and someone else had buzzed or twanged my dream on their own Beerpintoblabberblob. At last it all made sense!

I drained the last mouthful of milk from my glass, stood up, and bid the milk bar Jesuit farewell. As I crashed out of the door into the street, I saw, in the distance, a duckpond. Several ducks were waddling their way slowly towards the milk bar. It seemed there were to be further mesmeric revelations before the day was done. I smiled at the thought, quite unlike a depressed horse, and headed for home, and my laughing cow.

IMG_2691

News Of The World

With the demise of a vile diet of moral squalor and pap their favourite newspaper which they bought in their millions, no doubt the British working class are at last ready to heed Cornelius Cardew’s stirring call-to-arms from 1979…

All together now…

British ruling class puffed up with arrogance
Boasted that the sun shone on your vast empire
That sun has now eclipsed.
British ruling class, we have got news for you.
Your time has run out; You have got to go.

Light is shining in the sky
Heralding the dawn of a glorious new day,
British working class you’re the revolutionary force.
To build our socialist land.

British working class you have a fine history
Fierce battles waged against a vicious enemy
With grim determination.
British working class aspires to revolution
In the face of attempt to crush this aspiration.
Of socialism in Britain

Chorus

In the 1840s Marx and Engels on our shores
Organised and hammered out the objective laws propelling history
Marxist-Leninist science is the guiding star
Charting the course of the working class:
Socialist revolution.

Chorus

Persisting in the face of every difficulty
In 1979 was formed our new party, a glorious victory.
Rallying to this flag is the only way, workers
To usher in, a bright new day of
Socialism in Britain.

Victorian Potato Fun

As witness the performer who, for many years now, has been exhibiting in the streets of London, the tools of his craft being a bag of large-sized raw potatoes. The man is beyond middle age, and his head is bald, or nearly so; and all over his cranium, from the forehead to the base of his skull, are bumps unknown to the phrenologist. There are blue bumps, and bumps of a faded greenish hue, and bumps red and inflamed, and his bald sconce looks as though it had been out in a rain of spent bullets. It is not so, however; it has only been exposed to a downpour of raw potatoes.

Read more about this magnificent potato man at The Cat’s Meat Shop.

The Dabbler (Actual Size)

Dabbler-3logo (1)

Critically important advice, in my cupboard at The Dabbler, on correct apprehension of the dimensions of sea beasties. I claim no credit, as the piece is basically a paraphrase of Pebblehead, from one of his innumerable bestselling paperbacks.

Over the years, many readers have written to ask if there is any truth in the rumour that, long before Frost/Nixon, there was a project entitled Frost/Pebblehead, or even Pebblehead/Nixon, which had to be abandoned due to pelf and priggishness and panic and other things beginning with P. Many readers have asked, and none has been answered, for I chuck all such enquiries into a waste chute, down which they fall, rolling and tumbling, until they reach the fires of hell, where they burn to a crisp. Some things are better left uninvestigated, unresearched, unsaid.

British Psychology

Following on from the potted sketches of our national character by Brit and Wartime Housewife, let us turn to Norman Davies. It is far too long since I have posted extracts from his magnificent pamphlet Further Science : Book 20 (2001), which I introduced to readers way back in January 2004, and quoted further in February 2004 and July 2005. Here then, exactly as it appears in the pamphlet, is Davies on “British Psychology”:

1.  That Country Inventions etc., reveal innate area psychology.

2. Cornwall – informal golden frills / harvest festival / nudist beach / carol service.

3. Devon opposite formal garden frills – orange code guildhall / use of Wedding March.

4. Somerset – soft dreamy colour squares – coloured glass / soft cheese / child pub – contrasts with Gloucester – dream formaIity – bowling green / Sunday School.

5. Dorset / Hants have formal round hotel / bowls / sea cave.

6. Sussex – complex old explosive – loves fireworks / gas lighting / Town Women’s Guild / antiques / Brighton sex.

7. Kent is the odd formal – Council lottery / Waltzing Matilda – in contrast to Essex odd informal – Peculiar People / Dunmow Flitch / heated armchair / hair FC colours.

8. London small family segments – Bingo / one parent families. Middx small clappers – squash etc.

9. Berks – small rounds – Table tennis / Job Centre and Oxford – mass of small items – Oxfam / marmalade / Hand ball / Post Office.

10. Herts / Northants noisy organised complex units – digital computer / go kart / map / CB Radio / speedway.

11. Norfolk – fish finger / dead static oblong, opposite to Leicester lively circles / motor mower / cycling / drive in store.

12. Notts – larger rounds – Sports centre / football / sugar / Spot ball / Boots.

13. Derby – muck frenzy – bakers / disposable nappy / mice racing.

14. Cheshire – murky prying – neighbourhood watch / women’s pubs.

15. Lancs – of mass smooth silky moving little bits – Co-op / small claims Court / NSPCC / Music Hall / athletes club / test tube baby / Police panda cars and radios / computer / nurses strike etc.

16. Yorks – slow rough organised bits – Rugby League / Con man / high rise flats / Building Society / tortoise Olympics / old folk bus / smoke free zone / Marks and Spencer.

17. Durham etc. – thin tube lively bits – electric lamp Fallopian tube transplant / whippet / turbine / keep fit etc.

Fatso Versus Camazotz

I have received a bat-letter from Miss Dimity Cashew.

Dear Mr Key, she writes, Like most people, I have always believed that the hideous bat god Fatso is the most terrifying of all bat deities. This has been an article of faith for as long as I can remember. However, I recently stumbled upon Wayne Ferrebee’s blog Ferrebeekeeper, where I discovered some rather alarming details about Camazotz, the Death Bat. Now, while I am no expert on bat deities and their varying levels of hideousness, violence, and terror, it seems to me that Camazotz would prove a formidable opponent were he and the hideous bat god Fatso pitted against each other in some kind of apocalyptic clash of bat deities. Your views on the likely outcome of such a battle would be much appreciated, also of course the betting odds, in case I fancied taking a flutter.

Yours primly, Dimity Cashew (Miss)

PS – I enclose a snapshot of Camazotz from Mr Ferrebee’s blog, so you can appreciate just how terrifying he is. The bat god I mean, not Mr Ferrebee, obviously.

Rather than bashing out an impromptu reply, I think I shall need to embark upon some serious bat god research before jumping to any conclusions. Watch this space.

camazotz

History Lesson

Last year, I drew to your attention Brit’s capsule history of Britain, 1939-2010, in seventy-seven words. Now another indefatigable blogger, the esteemed Wartime Housewife, has managed to sum up the history of England in just seven words:

England wasn’t built on glamour and competence.

If tinies were still taught anything approaching history in their Self-Esteem Workshop Community Hubs, that would make a perfect essay title. Discuss.

Stubbings

Let us discuss, as if our lives depended upon it, stubbings of the toe. But wait a minute! How likely is it that our lives could ever depend upon a stubbing, or stubbings, of a toe, or toes? There is, I suppose, the possibility that we might be arraigned before a firing squad, blindfolded, wearing a white shirt, its top buttons undone, hands bound behind our back, jaw jutting in revolutionary or irredentist defiance, and at the moment when the moustachioed Capitan is about to give the order to fire, he stubs his toe, and instead shouts “Ouch!”, and the firing squad, disconcerted, lowers its rifles, thus winning us a reprieve from death.

I can immediately think of two problems with this scenario. First, upon what nature of object, likely to be encountered on a ground suitable for the assembly of a firing squad, could the Capitan stub his toe sufficient to cause him to cry out, given that his toes would be encased in sturdy military boots? We might posit a block of iron, inexplicably left lying around just where the Capitan is standing, but why, at the point of issuing the order to fire, would he think to move his foot, and even if he did, would he not notice the iron block? All toe-stubbings are accidental, and the accident here imagined is beyond the bounds of common sense. It is true that some men rise to the rank of Capitan though they be fools, or wet behind the ears, or otherwise lacking in nous, but even so…

A second objection is that, having stubbed his toe, and shouted “Ouch!” instead of “Fire!”, and the firing squad having been disconcerted, the execution would be cancelled entire rather than merely postponed. Indeed, it is probable that it would not be postponed for very long. A toe-stubbing is, by definition, a sharp and instant trauma, and though the toe may throb for a goodly length of time, the shock itself quickly passes, and one has one’s wits about one within seconds. Thus, having unexpectedly said “Ouch!”, the Capitan, if he is at all worth his Capitan’s salt, will brush off the accident and proceed with his proper business, which in this circumstance is the order to the firing squad to bring about our destruction under a volley of bullets.

A third problem has just occurred to me, which is that the firing squad, tensed up and ready to fire, might well respond to any barked exclamation from their Capitan, and not pause to discriminate between “Ouch!” and “Fire!” or indeed any other noise that issues from his mouth at that precise moment.

The general point here is that the stubbing of the Capitan’s toe does not become a matter of life and death, because however we consider the situation our death is inevitable. Whether or not it is just, in view of our revolutionary or irredentist credentials, need not concern us here.

But what about a wholly different circumstance where, say, we are a passenger aboard a locomotive, chugging at high speed across a high bridge, and the engine driver, in the necessarily confined space of his engine driver’s cabin, and in the course of the necessary physical manoeuvres of his engine driver’s duties, stubs his toe on the kind of hard metal panel or protuberance inevitably present in such a cabin at the front of such a locomotive? Now  I am wholly unacquainted with the ins and outs of the engine driver’s art, but it seems to me that in a situation such as the one described there is a very real danger of the brief and temporary shock of a toe-stubbing leading to much greater disaster. If we consider the Capitan again for a moment, we should note that he has but the one decision to make, that of ordering the firing squad to shoot, and is at leisure to choose the moment. He may pause to preen his epaulettes, or to smoke a cigarette, even to offer a last cigarette to us as we await death. But for the engine driver, in control of a huge machine rattling at high speed across a high bridge, there is no such opportunity for relaxation. He must be ever alert, and the momentary loss of concentration entailed by the stubbing of his toe could well lead to him losing control of the engine and the locomotive being derailed and plunging off the bridge to crash into the river rapids far below, causing mayhem and destruction and, yes, death not only for himself but for all the passengers aboard the locomotive. Even the strongest of swimmers among us are likely to be too seriously maimed by the fall and impact to be capable of safely reaching the riverbank, in the unlikely event that the wild currents of the rapids did not dash us against jagged and treacherous rocks.

It is fair to say, then, that there are indeed circumstances where the stubbing of a toe can be a matter of life and death. Bear that in mind when next you prepare to go out of your house, as you consider which socks, which boots, best meet the possible perils of the day.

10,000 Nails In The Coffin Of Imperialism

Here is the score of Cornelius Cardew’s 1971 piece 10,000 Nails In The Coffin Of Imperialism. (Click on the image for a slightly larger view.) Note particularly that “yeah!” at the end.

coffin

Cardew submitted the piece for publication in the magazine Aspen, but it was rejected by the editor, American composer Tom Johnson, for being “just too out of keeping with the issue as a whole”. How different the world might be, forty years later, if the piece had been published! All over the world, proletarians would have pored over the latest issue of Aspen in their millions, seized on the revolutionary implications of Cardew’s score, and begun the inevitable historical process of driving those ten thousand nails into the coffin of imperialism, thus ushering in a bright new Maoist Utopia of political re-education camps and mass famine, where “workers would machine-gun bosses into bloody pits”, in the words of a poem in praise of Cardew’s political mentor Hardial Bains. Er… yeah!

Do The Dabble

Dabbler-3logo (1)

In The Dabbler this week, I reproduce part of an instruction manual from the Frank Key Academy of Terpsichorean Élan. I am afraid to say that a pre-publication reader for The Dabbler, employed to vet all contributions, contacted me a few days ago and had the gall to call into question my qualifications for running such an academy.

Dear Mr Key, he wrote, on laughably self-important “Dabbler Pre-Publication Vetting Protocol” headed notepaper, Much as we admire your pratings, we must strain every sinew to protect our readers from charlatanry, poppycock, and flapdoodle. If, for example, we were to run a piece on the Black Bat of Harrenhal, we would entrust the commission to a writer fully conversant with the career of Ser Oswell Whent, not to some booby. These are important and serious matters, after all. That being so, I cannot help wondering why in the name of all that is holy you presume to lecture our readers on the art of dance, when it is blindingly obvious that you could not dance your way out of a paper bag. Yes, Mr Key! Before I took up my current post with The Dabbler I was an official observer at the Pointy Town Paper Bag Danceathon, and well do I recall the pitiful figure you cut, for six or seven hours, as you failed to make your escape from the paper bag by dint of the twist, the hoo-cha, the Watusi, and the peasants’ reel, turn and turn about. I am afraid that wild horses would not drag me into the unconscionable position of passing your piece for publication.

As it happens, that last sentence was an idle boast. Upon receipt of this pompous cant, I hi-ho’ed over to Dabbler HQ with a harras of wild horses in tow. Wild? They were savage, almost demonic. We soon got the matter settled, and I doubt I shall be hearing from that little twerp in future.